🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.